Congratulations to them! Let’s make it happen here!
County of Santa Cruz
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RE: RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS TO GROW AND CONSUME THEIR OWN FOOD PRODUCTS AND TO ENTER INTO PRIVATE CONTRACTS WITH OTHER INDIVIDUALS TO BOARD ANIMALS FOR FOOD
Dear Members of the Board:
For many years, Santa Cruz County has been at the forefront of the local food movement. It has long been recognized that eating locally and growing your own food supports sustainability, local farmers, and healthy eating. Santa Cruz County residents have supported this movement through community gardens, local farmers’ markets, and a plethora of locally produced foods. The farmers’ markets in Santa Cruz County sell not only local and organic fruits and vegetables, but local eggs and sustainably raised meat products as well. Many innovative county residents have also started shared garden plots where individuals who have large gardens share their produce with those who don’t have space for gardens in exchange for labor or other goods and services. In the past few years, county residents who desire fresh dairy products, but don’t live in a rural area where they can raise their own animals, have chosen to participate in what is called a herd share.
Herd shares operate like a private club, where a limited group of individuals purchase a share in an animal, most commonly chickens, goats, or cows. The members of the share then own a part of that animal and enter into a contract whereby the farmer (or owner of the property where the animal will live) feeds and boards the animal. The milk, eggs or meat are then distributed to the members of the share to consume as they wish.
The share member does not buy the milk, eggs or meat from the farmer because as part owner of the animal, the share owner already owns a portion of the product produced by the animal. Rather, the share owner pays a fee to the farmer to cover the cost of feed, vet bills, and boarding the animal.
Recently the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) has begun sending cease and desist orders across California to small farmers and owners of herd shares that distribute dairy or meat products among their members. While it is legitimate for government to see that producers are following the law in order to ensure the highest level of food safety for the public, there must be a distinction made between those farmers engaging in direct commerce with the public, as in the case of a farmer’s market or grocery store, and those individuals choosing to take part in a private herd share or community garden share.
The County of Santa Cruz has a large rural area where residents have the ability to host share animals. In addition, many county residents desire and seek a direct relationship with their food and have chosen to participate in herd shares for this reason. Further, some residents have health issues that prevent them from consuming commercially produced dairy products and have turned to herd shares to provide milk and other dairy products that they can safely consume.
It is important to protect the rights of individuals to grow and consume their own food and to enter into private contracts with other individuals to board animals for food. It is also important to recognize that this movement encourages a healthy and environmentally friendly form of small-scale agriculture in our community.
Accordingly, we recommend that the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing these basic rights and direct the Clerk of the Board to distribute the resolution as indicated.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO.
On the motion of Supervisor
duly seconded by Supervisor
the following resolution is adopted
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS TO GROW AND CONSUME THEIR OWN FOOD AND TO ENTER INTO PRIVATE CONTRACTS WITH OTHER INDIVIDUALS TO BOARD ANIMALS FOR FOOD
WHEREAS, as has been the case throughout our local history, the people of the County of Santa Cruz, for a multitude of reasons, have maintained and enjoyed the right to raise food for themselves and their families; and
WHEREAS, in this day and age, there are many barriers to people raising their own food and livestock, including the land required for such activities, accessibility, time, knowledge, and skills; and
WHEREAS, as part of the right to raise food for themselves and their families, subject to zoning and land use laws, the people have and maintain the right to raise such food on their own land, and where desired, to contract with others to rent sufficient land for the growing of that food, for boarding their poultry and livestock, and for hiring services related to its care, maintenance, raising, and harvesting; and
WHEREAS, as part of that right, the people have the right to own, and where they deem it convenient to share ownership of, such agricultural activities, livestock, and other food producing animals for their own use, enjoyment, and consumption; and
WHEREAS, no local, state or federal law bars any person from raising their own food for use by themselves and their families; and
WHEREAS, it is important that the rights outlined above be maintained and that efforts are made to encourage a healthy and environmentally friendly form of small scale agriculture.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors supports, endorses, and encourages the recognition of the right and freedom of people to raise their own food, including food derived from agricultural animals, for the enjoyment of themselves and their families, either by their own investment and labor or through the assistance of others through contractual arrangements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors
supports the adoption of local, state, and federal laws that support and encourage the American people continuing the activities of raising food for themselves and their families.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa
Cruz, State of California, this day of , 2011, by the following vote:
MARK W. STONE, Chairperson
Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
Clerk of said Board
DISTRIBUTION: California Department of Food and Agriculture
Senator Sam Blakeslee
Senator Joe Simitian
Assembly member Bill Manning
Assembly member Luis Alejo
Health Services Agency
County Counsel
1446A3
This is fantastic! Who can we work with in Nevada County to pass a resolution like this here? Thanks for sharing!
Pingback: California’s Santa Cruz County passes Food Freedom resolution to protect private cowshares and food freedom | The Bovine
Finally a local government that appears to not be corrupted by the power of being lawmakers. I salute these fine humans..
Neither the FDA nor any state public health board has jurisdiction over herdshares anyway, but it is helpful to have these rights asserted by the local government through such a resolution.
Now we need one of these resolutions in El Dorado County as well, I dont expect it to happen anytime soon, its so backwards here.
@AED939 I thought that if any specific california county had a county milk board or something similar that governing body chose the specific county regs regarding distribution of milk for consumption, including herdshares, but since most counties do not have a resolution it defaults to the state regulations. Please correct me if I’m wrong since I’d love to legally distribute my goats milk.
Would a milk-in at the Nevada City farmer’s market help bring a local food freedom resolution to our county? Maybe on Oct. 8th?
Currently before our Grant county, New Mexico Food Policy Council is a ordinance very similar to this, as well as the Maine ordinance passed there this past spring. This is catching on all over the nation. If there was ever something to be hopeful about in these times it is the will of the people to determine in terms of food what they want for themselves and their families.
We can only hope that this type of re-write finds root in state and nation levels. From the bottom up, change will recreate our futures with. positives outcomes.
Grant County New Mexico. Silver City, Mimbres and Gila, the mining districts. is also looking at a similar ordinance for local grow and consumption.
Before one goes to alot of effort, I strongly suggest investigating the difference between a resolution (Santa Cruz County,CA) and an ordinance (Grant County,NM).
I believe what will be found is a resolution to be little more than a kind “pat on the head” with very little, if any, legal standing or protection. Whereas an ordinance is an actual codified piece of local legislation to be known as the law of the land in that county.
We already have a “Right To Farm ‘Ordinance’.” Let’s follow those who have gone before us!
I think you are completely right here, Kirk.
An ordinance is what we need. Can we pass one?
Here’s a link to a report on the proposed Grant County, New Mexico’s ordinance. I’d like to hear more about this.
I like the Stevens County, Washington proposed ordinance a lot.